What are the best alternatives to Salesforce?
Pipedrive — Known for its simplicity and intuitive visual pipeline. Ideal for small sales teams that prioritize ease-of-use over complex configurability.
Per client: what ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity say when their buyers ask, who gets named instead, which pages the answer was read from, and the line to change.
| Client | Reads as | Named | Listed first | Pages read | Above them | To do |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pipedrive.comlast run 1 Oct | sales pipeline CRM | 2 of 2 | 0 of 2 | 22 of 24 | Zoho CRM | 3 |
| otterly.ailast run 5 Oct | AI search visibility tool | 2 of 2 | 0 of 2 | 23 of 27 | Peec AI | 4 |
| + Add a client — its own category, buyer, rivals and questions | ||||||
A buyer at a B2B software company asks three different questions on the way to a decision. One score across all of them hides the one you are losing.
One number across every question. Which question are you losing? Which buyer? Which rival? The score can’t say.
Three questions, three verdicts, each with the answer and the cited page underneath. You see which stage to fix, and the line that fixes it.
They heard it from a buyer, or from their CEO, and the question lands on you. One answer, the page it was read from, and the nearest line on the client’s own site — quoted and dated, so the answer you give back is evidence, not an opinion.
What are the best alternatives to Salesforce?
Pipedrive — Known for its simplicity and intuitive visual pipeline. Ideal for small sales teams that prioritize ease-of-use over complex configurability.
Zoho CRM offers the broadest low-cost feature set, while Pipedrive is the better choice when a team mainly needs a clear sales pipeline.
One line, where comparison writers look, on what you do beyond the pipeline: automations, email sequences, forecasts, in your own words.
Our readingChatGPT places this client as the simple pipeline and credits Zoho with breadth, and the page it cites says the same. Their features page says “advanced Automations”, but not in a line a comparison article would quote.
Every number is a count of saved answers. Click it in the app and the answers are underneath.
Named in 2 of 2 buyer answers · offered in 2 · listed first in 0.
2 buyer answers · ChatGPT · ▲ from your second runOne sentence with its count: named, offered or picked, per answer, per engine. Your rank among your rivals, and the change since the last run.
| Rival | League | Above you |
|---|---|---|
| Zoho CRM | same | 1 of 2 |
| HubSpot | same | 1 of 2 |
| Close | same | 0 of 2 |
| Dynamics 365 | above | not compared |
You mark who you actually compete with. “Above you” is counted against them only. The enterprise leader AI keeps naming stays as evidence, not as your benchmark.
Problems first, in buyer terms. Under each: what AI said, the cited page, your nearest line, then the change on your page or theirs.
Not “best CRM”. Questions in the client’s sub-category, for the segment they sell to, at the stage their buyer is in: discovering, comparing, deciding. Written from the client’s own pages, and yours to keep, edit or remove before anything is asked.
You see the passage before and after, each with the date we read it.
Asks the same questions again on your next run.
We don’t promise traffic, and neither check guarantees AI will change its answer. They show you what changed.
Before anything runs, we read your site and propose what you are, who you sell to and your rivals. You edit, then confirm. Nothing is asked or charged until you do.
Your questions, by stage, on ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.
We open every cited page and read the line that backs the answer.
On your site, on theirs, on the pages AI reads. Verbatim, linked.
Problems first, the change under each, re-checked on the next run.
Built for B2B software: a product a company buys for its team, with rivals and a buying committee. Not for consumer brands, local businesses or e-commerce catalogues — the questions a buyer asks there are not the ones we write.
We read the client’s site and propose what they are, who they sell to and who they compete with. You edit — that is the account manager’s call, and it is kept. The cost is on the screen. Nothing is asked or charged until you confirm.
Your questions on ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, the answers, the cited pages, your nearest line, what to change. No card.
Start steering →or read a real report first →Runs daily at a time you choose, change since last run, every page of the dashboard. The price is on the Pricing page and on the confirm screen before each run.
See pricing →Each client gets their own rivals, questions and report. Set once by the account manager, repeated every run.
AI visibility for B2B agencies →I build AI systems for a living. Every AI answer here is treated as data: stored, traced to its sources and checked.
If a claim isn’t on the page it cites, the report doesn’t show it as backed. No invented numbers, no filler.
Questions and feedback about your report reach me, not a support queue.
I’m working with a few B2B SaaS teams on deeper reports. Want to be one of them? Email me →
Each client is set up as its own brand: its own category and buyer, its own confirmed rivals, its own questions by stage. Nothing is shared between clients but the login, so one client's rivals never leak into another's report.
The same screens you see: the answers, the pages they cited, the nearest line on their own site, and what to change. Every number opens the answers behind it, so nothing in the report is a score you have to defend on a call.
You do, per client, on the confirm screen. That is the account manager's judgement and it is kept, run after run, until you change it. Nothing is guessed from the client's site and used as fact.
ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity today. Each run asks every question on each of them. Engines are added when we can save and cite their answers the same way.
Per client brand on one account, with the first run free and no card. The cost of each run is shown on the confirm screen before it runs.
Then this is the wrong tool. The questions are written for a buyer choosing a product their company will run — team size, integrations, onboarding, price per seat. For consumer brands, local businesses or e-commerce, the questions a buyer asks are different and we don't write them.
One client’s domain, then a confirm screen with their category, their rivals and the cost. Nothing runs until you say so.
Running it for your own product? AI visibility for B2B software →